Trends

The evolving PFAS regulatory landscape presents significant ESG risks. New EPA regulations, including stricter drinking water standards and hazardous substance designations, amplify the "polluter pays" framework. From an expert witness standpoint, this escalates corporate liability and necessitates greater transparency. We foresee increased litigation over historical contamination and deficient risk management. Proactive PFAS footprint management is now crucial for companies to avoid severe financial and reputational repercussions, making this a key concern for investors and stakeholders.

As electric vehicles (EVs) become more common, the risk of product liability for manufacturers is a growing concern. A key issue is the lack of a robust and skilled EV repair and servicing infrastructure. Many traditional auto businesses are not equipped to handle the complexities of EVs, which rely on sophisticated battery systems, high-voltage components, and complex software. This creates a gap between consumer expectations for safe and competent servicing and the industry's current capabilities. This gap increases the risk of malfunctions and safety failures, potentially leading to battery fires or loss of vehicle control, and raises questions of liability between the manufacturer and the repairer.